Thanks, Johanna. IMHO, it says We the People better get some more ammo.
I added this language to the beginning to make it more clear: [3.2] 5.(c) "Assistance in responding with assets with potential for lethality, or any situation in which it is reasonably foreseeable that providing the requested assistance may involve the use of force that is likely to result in lethal force, including death or serious bodily injury. It also includes all support to civilian law enforcement officials in situations where a confrontation between civilian law enforcement and civilian individuals or groups is reasonably anticipated. Such use of force must be in accordance with DoDD 5210.56, potentially as further restricted based on the specifics of the requested support. "
Does any person not in danger of said assistance speak and or communicate electronically any such language if applicable? If so, speak up or forever hold your peace.
Bravo Liz. What pray tell does this directive say? 🙋🏼♀️
Thanks, Johanna. IMHO, it says We the People better get some more ammo.
I added this language to the beginning to make it more clear: [3.2] 5.(c) "Assistance in responding with assets with potential for lethality, or any situation in which it is reasonably foreseeable that providing the requested assistance may involve the use of force that is likely to result in lethal force, including death or serious bodily injury. It also includes all support to civilian law enforcement officials in situations where a confrontation between civilian law enforcement and civilian individuals or groups is reasonably anticipated. Such use of force must be in accordance with DoDD 5210.56, potentially as further restricted based on the specifics of the requested support. "
Thanks for your comment!
I remember that song!
Does any person not in danger of said assistance speak and or communicate electronically any such language if applicable? If so, speak up or forever hold your peace.